Western North Carolina Conference v. Talley

39 S.E.2d 816, 226 N.C. 654, 1946 N.C. LEXIS 299
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided October 30, 1946·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Defendants’ motion is in effect a demurrer for misjoinder of parties, interposed after answer was filed. It came too late. Goldsboro v. Supply Co., 200 N. C., 405, 157 S. E., 58; Schnibben v. Ballard & Ballard Co., 210 N. C., 193, 185 S. E., 646; Ezzell v. Merritt, 224 N. C., 602, 31 S. E. (2d), 751; McIntosh, N. C. P. & P., 457. Having answered, bis motion was addressed to tbe sound discretion of tbe court. Its adverse ruling is not subject to review.

The judgment below is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Western North Carolina Conference v. Talley, 39 S.E.2d 816, 226 N.C. 654, 1946 N.C. LEXIS 299 (N.C. 1946).

39 S.E.2d 816 (Western North Carolina Conference v. Talley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Schnibben v. . Ballard Ballard Co.
185 S.E. 646 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1936)
City of Goldsboro v. W. P. Rose Builders Supply Co.
157 S.E. 58 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1931)
Ezzell v. . Merritt
31 S.E.2d 751 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1944)