Western Maryland Employees' Ass'n v. National Mediation Board

2 D.C. 144
CourtDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals
DecidedJuly 1, 1935
DocketEquity No. 58746
StatusPublished

This text of 2 D.C. 144 (Western Maryland Employees' Ass'n v. National Mediation Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Western Maryland Employees' Ass'n v. National Mediation Board, 2 D.C. 144 (D.C. 1935).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

BAILEY, J.

As, in my opinion, the matters raised by the cross-bill are not germane to those raised by the original bill, the service of process upon counsel for the Western Maryland Railway Co. should be quashed.

While a cross-bill filed by a defendant against the plaintiff may be filed although the matters raised in it be not germane to those of the original bill, the cross-bill in this case is filed by an intenvenor and is not “in subordination to or in recognition to the propriety of the main proceeding.”

In addition it would seem that the Western Maryland Railway Co. would be a necessary party to this cross-bill, and is not within the jurisdiction of this Court, except as to matters germane to the original bill.

The motions to quash service and to strike the answer of the American Railways employees in so far as it is a cross-bill will be sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 D.C. 144, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/western-maryland-employees-assn-v-national-mediation-board-dc-1935.