Home/Ninth Circuit/Western MacHinery Company, a Corporation v. Northwestern Improvement Company, a Corporation

Western MacHinery Company, a Corporation v. Northwestern Improvement Company, a Corporation

254 F.2d 453
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 5, 1958
Docket15238
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 254 F.2d 453 (Western MacHinery Company, a Corporation v. Northwestern Improvement Company, a Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Western MacHinery Company, a Corporation v. Northwestern Improvement Company, a Corporation, 254 F.2d 453 (9th Cir. 1958).

Opinion

JAMES ALGER FEE, Circuit Judge.

In an action on a written contract for sale and purchase of machinery, *455 the trial eourt held that the sole signatory thereto as buyer was a surety, who was released because the court found that another, unnamed in the instrument, was principal and that time had been extended to the latter without the consent of the surety. The first question is whether the signer bound itself personally by contract as purchaser. The answer depends upon the legal interpretation of a writing under the law of the State of Washington.

Western Machinery Company, through J. Stanley Iluckaba, its sales representative, duly authorized to make contracts binding upon the company for sale of machinery, entered into a series of negotiations with Earl R. McMillan for the sale of a coal washing plant. The latter was the only official of Northwestern Improvement Company representing it in the State of Washington. He was, as its Manager of Coal Operations, authorized to accept an offer and sign a written contract for the purchase of coal washing machinery.

The following contract was entered into dated February 20, 1952:

*456

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stony Meadows Homeowners Ass'n, Resp/cross App V. Reid And Eike Kley, App/cross-resp
Court of Appeals of Washington, 2025
Fay Corp. v. Bat Holdings I, Inc.
646 F. Supp. 946 (W.D. Washington, 1986)
Utility Contractors, Inc. v. United States
32 Cont. Cas. Fed. 73,446 (Court of Claims, 1985)
Anderson v. Gardner
647 P.2d 3 (Utah Supreme Court, 1982)
Belgrade State Bank v. Swainson
564 P.2d 174 (Montana Supreme Court, 1977)
Baggett Transportation Co. v. United States
162 Ct. Cl. 570 (Court of Claims, 1963)
Baggett Transportation Company v. The United States
319 F.2d 864 (Court of Claims, 1963)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
254 F.2d 453, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/western-machinery-company-a-corporation-v-northwestern-improvement-ca9-1958.