Western Lithograph Co. v. State Board of Equalization

78 P.2d 738, 11 Cal. 2d 776, 1938 Cal. LEXIS 354
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Western Lithograph Co. v. State Board of Equalization. Read the opinion of the Court — 11 Cal. 2d 156
California Supreme Court·Decided April 19, 1938·No. S. F. No. 15915·Published

Opinion

THE COURT.

The petitioner applied for a writ of mandate to compel the refund to it of taxes amounting to $269.24 paid pursuant to the provisions of the Retail Sales Tax Act of California.

The facts herein are similar to those stated in the opinion this day filed in the case of Western Lithograph Co. v. State Board of Equalization, S. F. No. 15914 (ante, p. 156 [78 Pac. (2d) 731]), with the exception that the bank to which the tangible personal property was sold was the California Bank, a state bank which was a member of the Federal Reserve System. It is claimed that as such member the California Bank is an instrumentality of the federal government, and the same contentions in support of the claim for refund are made here as were made in the foregoing case this day decided. All of the contentions made herein are controlled by the decision in that case. On the authority of that case the petition for the peremptory writ is denied and the alternative writ is discharged.

Rehearing denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Western Lithograph Co. v. State Board of Equalization, 78 P.2d 738, 11 Cal. 2d 776, 1938 Cal. LEXIS 354 (Cal. 1938).

78 P.2d 738 (Western Lithograph Co. v. State Board of Equalization) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Western Lithograph Co. v. State Board of Equalization
78 P.2d 731 (California Supreme Court, 1938)