Western Empire Constructors, Inc. v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office

769 P.2d 1089, 13 Brief Times Rptr. 84, 1989 Colo. App. LEXIS 27, 1989 WL 6062
CourtColorado Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 26, 1989
Docket88CA1810
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 769 P.2d 1089 (Western Empire Constructors, Inc. v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Colorado Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Western Empire Constructors, Inc. v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office, 769 P.2d 1089, 13 Brief Times Rptr. 84, 1989 Colo. App. LEXIS 27, 1989 WL 6062 (Colo. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

CRISWELL, Judge.

This workmen’s compensation matter is before us for consideration of the motion of claimant, Robert D. Holdsworth, for enlargement, of time in which to file a cross-appeal. We conclude that a petition for review, whether it is denominated an appeal or a cross-appeal, must be filed within 20 days after the date of the certificate of mailing of the Industrial Claim Appeals Panel’s final order. Accordingly, we deny the motion for enlargement of time.

C.A.R. 3.1(a) provides that an appeal from a final order of the Panel “shall be in the manner and within the time prescribed by statute.” Section 8-53-111(8), C.R.S. (1986 Repl.Vol. 3B), which governs appellate review of workmen’s compensation matters, provides that: “Any party dissatisfied with the panel’s order shall have twenty days after the date of the certificate of mailing of such order to file an appeal with the court of appeals.”

Section 8-53-111(8) does not provide for the filing of a cross-petition for review in workmen’s compensation matters; rather, it requires any party to seek review within twenty days of the Panel’s final order. Furthermore, the statute does not contain a provision allowing an extension of time in which to file a petition for review. See Lutheran Hospital & Homes Society v. Industrial Commission, 710 P.2d 496 (Colo.App.1985).

Accordingly, claimant’s motion for extension of time in which to seek review is denied.

PLANK and NEY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Janssen v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office
40 P.3d 1 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 2002)
Rice v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office of the State
937 P.2d 893 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 1997)
Picken v. Industrial Claim Appeals office
874 P.2d 485 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 1994)
Buschmann v. Gallegos Masonry, Inc.
805 P.2d 1193 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 1991)
St. Vincent's Hospital v. Alires
778 P.2d 277 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
769 P.2d 1089, 13 Brief Times Rptr. 84, 1989 Colo. App. LEXIS 27, 1989 WL 6062, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/western-empire-constructors-inc-v-industrial-claim-appeals-office-coloctapp-1989.