Western Electric Co. v. Anthracite Telephone Co.

Third Circuit

Western Electric Co. v. Anthracite Telephone Co.

133 F. 547, 66 C.C.A. 523, 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 4452

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedDecember 9, 1904

DocketNo. 1

StatusPublished

This text of 133 F. 547 (Western Electric Co. v. Anthracite Telephone Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Western Electric Co. v. Anthracite Telephone Co., 133 F. 547, 66 C.C.A. 523, 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 4452 (3d Cir. 1904).

Pincite

Opinion

DALLAS, Circuit Judge.

This was a suit in equity for alleged infringement by the defendants below (appellees here) of patent No. 449,106, dated March 31, 1891, issued to John J. Carty for telephone circuit and apparatus. The court below decided that this patent is invalid for lack of patentable invention, and, in our opinion, that decision was correct. This conclusion has been reached by all of us after careful examination of the record, and attentive consideration of the arguments of counsel. But they need not be referred to, for the opinion which was filed by the learned judges of the «Circuit Court adequately deals with the case. Upon that opinion (113 Fed. 834), the decree dismissing the bill of complaint is affirmed

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DALLAS, Circuit Judge.

This was a suit in equity for alleged infringement by the defendants below (appellees here) of patent No. 449,106, dated March 31, 1891, issued to John J. Carty for telephone circuit and apparatus. The court below decided that this patent is invalid for lack of patentable invention, and, in our opinion, that decision was correct. This conclusion has been reached by all of us after careful examination of the record, and attentive consideration of the arguments of counsel. But they need not be referred to, for the opinion which was filed by the learned judges of the «Circuit Court adequately deals with the case. Upon that opinion (113 Fed. 834), the decree dismissing the bill of complaint is affirmed

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

133 F. 547, 66 C.C.A. 523, 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 4452, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/western-electric-co-v-anthracite-telephone-co-ca3-1904.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack