Western Development Co. v. Emery
61 Cal. 611, 1882 Cal. LEXIS 671
Opinion
The contract sued on in this ease was made for the benefit of the plaintiff, and plaintiff is the real party in interest, as the money, when recovered, will belong to the Company. It follows that the action was properly brought in the name of The Western Development Company. (C. C. P., § 367; Summers v. Farish, 10 Cal. 347; Wiggins v. McDonald, 18 id. 126.)
Judgment and order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Western Development Co. v. Emery, 61 Cal. 611, 1882 Cal. LEXIS 671 (Cal. 1882).
61 Cal. 611 (Western Development Co. v. Emery) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Horseshoe Pier Amusement Co. v. Sibley
108 P. 308 (California Supreme Court, 1910)