Western Contracting Corp. v. United States

376 F.2d 851
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedApril 28, 1967
DocketNos. 10956, 10957
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 376 F.2d 851 (Western Contracting Corp. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Western Contracting Corp. v. United States, 376 F.2d 851 (4th Cir. 1967).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This action was brought under the provisions of the Miller Act, 40 U.S.C. § 270b (1964), by use plaintiff Encrete, Inc., against Western Contracting Corporation and its surety, Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, to recover amounts allegedly due under a contract between Encrete and Leslie Miller, Inc. Leslie Miller, Inc. is a cross-defendant. In these appeals, the interests of all defendants are identical.

During the years 1960 to 1962, En-crete performed certain construction work at Dulles International Airport, Chantilly, Virginia, pursuant to a contract between it and Leslie Miller, Inc., who was a subcontractor of Western Contracting, the prime contractor. This action was commenced in the federal district court as a result of a dispute between Encrete and Leslie Miller, Inc. as to how much money remained due En-crete under its contract. The district court appointed a special master for the purpose of taking evidence and reporting his findings on all disputed issues to the court. After considering the exceptions of all parties to the special master’s report, the district court approved the report and entered judgment in accordance with it. Both sides appealed.

All parties have vigorously argued in their briefs and in oral presentation before this Court that various errors of fact and law were made by the special master and approved by the district court. We have considered the argu[852]*852ments and examined carefully the special master’s report and the record, and we find no ground for reversal.

The judgment of the district court is Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
376 F.2d 851, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/western-contracting-corp-v-united-states-ca4-1967.