Western Coal & Mining Co. v. Tulloss

1914 OK 344, 142 P. 1035, 43 Okla. 298, 1914 Okla. LEXIS 515
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided July 21, 1914·No. 6257·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On December 22, 1913, judgment was rendered and entered for plaintiff, whereupon a motion was granted extending the time in which tó file a motion for new trial. On December 29, 1913, a motion for a new trial was filed and overruled, and defendant brings the case here.

The motion to dismiss is sustained for the reason that the motion for new trial was filed out of time. Rev. Laws 1910, sec. 5035, is mandatory, and the trial court had no power to grant an extension beyond the time specified in the statute. Allen v. Gates, 38 Okla. 408, 134 Pac. 51; Joiner v. Goldsmith, 25 Okla. 840, 107 Pac. 733.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Western Coal & Mining Co. v. Tulloss, 1914 OK 344, 142 P. 1035, 43 Okla. 298, 1914 Okla. LEXIS 515 (Okla. 1914).

1914 OK 344 (Western Coal & Mining Co. v. Tulloss) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Woodyard v. Burdett
1924 OK 1072 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1924)
Roberts v. Sims
1924 OK 959 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1924)
Farmers' Grain & Supply Co. v. Isaac
1916 OK 616 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1916)