Western Coal & Mining Co. v. Tulloss

1914 OK 344, 142 P. 1035, 43 Okla. 298, 1914 Okla. LEXIS 515
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedJuly 21, 1914
Docket6257
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 1914 OK 344 (Western Coal & Mining Co. v. Tulloss) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Western Coal & Mining Co. v. Tulloss, 1914 OK 344, 142 P. 1035, 43 Okla. 298, 1914 Okla. LEXIS 515 (Okla. 1914).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On December 22, 1913, judgment was rendered and entered for plaintiff, whereupon a motion was granted extending the time in which tó file a motion for new trial. On December 29, 1913, a motion for a new trial was filed and overruled, and defendant brings the case here.

The motion to dismiss is sustained for the reason that the motion for new trial was filed out of time. Rev. Laws 1910, sec. 5035, is mandatory, and the trial court had no power to grant an extension beyond the time specified in the statute. Allen v. Gates, 38 Okla. 408, 134 Pac. 51; Joiner v. Goldsmith, 25 Okla. 840, 107 Pac. 733.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Woodyard v. Burdett
1924 OK 1072 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1924)
Roberts v. Sims
1924 OK 959 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1924)
Farmers' Grain & Supply Co. v. Isaac
1916 OK 616 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1916)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1914 OK 344, 142 P. 1035, 43 Okla. 298, 1914 Okla. LEXIS 515, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/western-coal-mining-co-v-tulloss-okla-1914.