Western Center for Journalism v. Internal Revenue Service

D.C. Circuit

Western Center for Journalism v. Internal Revenue Service

22 F. App'x 14

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided December 18, 2001·No. No. 00-5203·Published

Opinion

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs by the parties. After full review of the case, the court is satisfied that appropriate disposition of the appeal does not warrant an opinion. See D.C.Cir. R. 36(b). Accordingly, it is

[15] ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the decision of the District Court is affirmed substantially for the reasons given by the District Court.

The clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs by the parties. After full review of the case, the court is satisfied that appropriate disposition of the appeal does not warrant an opinion. See D.C.Cir. R. 36(b). Accordingly, it is

[15] ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the decision of the District Court is affirmed substantially for the reasons given by the District Court.

The clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

Western Center for Journalism v. Internal Revenue Service, 22 F. App'x 14 (D.C. Cir. 2001).

Pincite

22 F. App'x 14 (Western Center for Journalism v. Internal Revenue Service) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.