Western C. M. Co. v. Hilvert

Arizona Supreme Court

Western C. M. Co. v. Hilvert

142 P.2d 411, 61 Ariz. 131, 1944 Ariz. LEXIS 99

Arizona Supreme Court·Decided January 10, 1944·No. Civil No. 4551.·Published

Opinion

On October 18, 1943 (60 Ariz. 537, 142 P.2d 411) we remanded this cause for a new trial on the issue as to whether the statute of limitations had been tolled by the absences of appellee from the state. In our opinion rendered at that time we held the statute had run unless it was tolled by such absences and that from the record we could not determine that fact.

Thereafter, on November 1, 1943, appellant filed its motion for a rehearing. In such motion it reargues the points of law which we had fully considered and rejected in our opinion.

The motion for rehearing is denied.

McALISTER, C.J., and ROSS, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On October 18, 1943 (60 Ariz. 537, 142 P.2d 411) we remanded this cause for a new trial on the issue as to whether the statute of limitations had been tolled by the absences of appellee from the state. In our opinion rendered at that time we held the statute had run unless it was tolled by such absences and that from the record we could not determine that fact.

Thereafter, on November 1, 1943, appellant filed its motion for a rehearing. In such motion it reargues the points of law which we had fully considered and rejected in our opinion.

The motion for rehearing is denied.

McALISTER, C.J., and ROSS, J., concur.

Western C. M. Co. v. Hilvert, 142 P.2d 411, 61 Ariz. 131, 1944 Ariz. LEXIS 99 (Ark. 1944).

Pincite

142 P.2d 411 (Western C. M. Co. v. Hilvert) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related