Western Automobile Insurance v. Lyons

210 P. 1117, 112 Kan. 384, 1922 Kan. LEXIS 451
CourtSupreme Court of Kansas
DecidedDecember 9, 1922
DocketNo. 24,036
StatusPublished

This text of 210 P. 1117 (Western Automobile Insurance v. Lyons) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Western Automobile Insurance v. Lyons, 210 P. 1117, 112 Kan. 384, 1922 Kan. LEXIS 451 (kan 1922).

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, C. J.:

Action to enjoin the county officers from proceeding with the collection of taxes from plaintiff upon bonds of the United States which the latter had purchased and held during the year following the listing on March 1, 1920. The injunction was denied and plaintiff appeals.

Plaintiff had made three separate purchases of liberty bonds in 1920 in the months of April, ‘August and October, amounting to $30,000. In 1921 the taxing officers, against the protest of the plaintiff, listed the bonds for taxation as money owned on March 1, 1921, fixing the amount of the assessment in accordance with the time that the bonds had been owned during the preceding year. The assessment was made under the authority and rule prescribed in General Statutes 1915, section 11163, and the contention is that this section is unconstitutional and afforded no authority for imposing the tax.

[385]*385The precise question presented was directly involved and definitely determined in Lantz v. Hanna, 111 Kan. 461, 207 Pac. 767. It was there held that the part of the statute providing for the listing and taxation of bonds of the United States violated the constitutional principles of equality and uniformity of taxation in this state as well as' the federal statute and constitution. It may be said that the decision in the Lantz case had not been made when the trial court decided that the bonds were taxable and denied the injunction.

Following that authority the judgment of the district court is reversed and the cause remanded with the direction to enter judgment in favor of the plaintiff.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lantz v. Hanna
207 P. 767 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1922)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
210 P. 1117, 112 Kan. 384, 1922 Kan. LEXIS 451, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/western-automobile-insurance-v-lyons-kan-1922.