Home/Supreme Court of Georgia/Western & Atlantic Railroad v. Willingham

Western & Atlantic Railroad v. Willingham

22 S.E. 937, 97 Ga. 338
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedAugust 16, 1895
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 22 S.E. 937 (Western & Atlantic Railroad v. Willingham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Western & Atlantic Railroad v. Willingham, 22 S.E. 937, 97 Ga. 338 (Ga. 1895).

Opinions

Atkinson, J.

There was no error in refusing to give in charge to the jury the several requests presented by the defendant. There was sufficient evidence to warrant the verdict, and the trial judge having approved the same, this court will not overrule his discretion in .refusing to grant a new trial.

Judgment on piain Mil of exceptions affirmed.

Both Mils of exceptions filed by defendant in error dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ellis v. MAJOR GAS & OIL COMPANY, INC.
267 S.E.2d 485 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1980)
Bush v. Addison
151 S.E. 526 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1930)
Neal v. Medlin
138 S.E. 254 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1927)
Mitchell v. Owen
127 S.E. 122 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1925)
Horne & Ponder v. O. B. & E. J. Evans
120 S.E. 787 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)
LaGrange Grocery Co. v. Young & Griffin Coffee Co.
117 S.E. 673 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)
Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Manson
94 S.E. 1033 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1918)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
22 S.E. 937, 97 Ga. 338, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/western-atlantic-railroad-v-willingham-ga-1895.