Western & Atlantic Railroad v. Jackson

81 Ga. 478
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedDecember 12, 1888
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 81 Ga. 478 (Western & Atlantic Railroad v. Jackson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Western & Atlantic Railroad v. Jackson, 81 Ga. 478 (Ga. 1888).

Opinion

Blandford, Justice.

This was a certiorari case. The petition for certiorari [479]*479alleged that the petitioner had been sued in a certain justice’s court, and that at the trial term of the case leave of absence as to the same was granted by the justice to both of the petitioner’s attorneys, on account of business which required their attendance in other courts; but that, notwithstanding this, the justice, during the period for which the leave of absence was granted and. while said attorneys were absent attending to said business elsewhere, rendered judgment against the petitioner for the sum of $50; the action being for the killing of a cow by the petitioner. The petition did not set forth any ground of error, and there was no complaint that the court erred in any particular.

The code, §4052, requires that the petition for certiorari “shall plainly and distinctly set forth the errors complained of.” This requirement not having been complied with, the petition was properly dismissed.

A motion was made by counsel for the petitioner, in the court below, to amend the petition, setting forth the grounds of error, which motion was denied by the court.* This court, in the case of the Singer Manufacturing Company vs. Walker & Co., 77 Ga. 649, decided that the petition for certiorari could not be amended; and that decision controls this case. There was no error in the refusal of the court to allow the petitioner to amend.

The petition for certiorari is a proceeding to review the proceedings of an inferior judicatory and have the same considered and corrected, and the errors complained of must be set forth.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cohen v. Finkovitch
149 S.E. 66 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1929)
Hunt v. State
144 S.E. 148 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1928)
Davis v. Cunningham
120 S.E. 641 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)
Gaines v. Continental Aid Ass'n
95 S.E. 760 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1918)
Carroll v. Inner Shoe Tire Co.
94 S.E. 643 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)
Hackett v. Tate
89 S.E. 535 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)
Callaway v. City of Atlanta
64 S.E. 1105 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1909)
Landrum v. Moss
57 S.E. 965 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1907)
Neal v. Neal
50 S.E. 929 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1905)
Southern Oregon Co. v. Coos Co.
47 P. 584 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1897)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
81 Ga. 478, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/western-atlantic-railroad-v-jackson-ga-1888.