Western & Atlantic Railroad v. Blackford

63 S.E. 289, 131 Ga. 784, 1909 Ga. LEXIS 7
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 13, 1909
StatusPublished

This text of 63 S.E. 289 (Western & Atlantic Railroad v. Blackford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Western & Atlantic Railroad v. Blackford, 63 S.E. 289, 131 Ga. 784, 1909 Ga. LEXIS 7 (Ga. 1909).

Opinion

Atkinson, J.

1. When several plaintiffs sue jointly, the petition may be amended by striking the name of one or more of them who are not proper parties. Civil Code, §5105; Smith v. Hanie, 74 Ga. 324.

2. The evidence was sufficient to Support the verdict.

3. Other grounds of the motion for new trial not referred to in the brief of counsel for plaintiff in error are treated as abandoned.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur except Fish, O. J., absent. Tye, Peeples, Bryan & Jordan and R. J. & J. McGamy, for plaintiff in error. William B. Mann and Payne & Payne, contra..

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smith v. Hanie
74 Ga. 324 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1884)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
63 S.E. 289, 131 Ga. 784, 1909 Ga. LEXIS 7, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/western-atlantic-railroad-v-blackford-ga-1909.