Westerman v. Westerman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Westerman v. Westerman

1 A.D.2d 892

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 30, 1956

StatusPublished

This text of 1 A.D.2d 892 (Westerman v. Westerman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Westerman v. Westerman, 1 A.D.2d 892 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an order denying appellants’ motion to dismiss the amended complaint pursuant to subdivision 4 of rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion granted. There is no present necessity for a declaratory judgment in an action to uphold an inchoate right of dower. (Buffington v. Mayper, 235 App. Div. 866.) Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Beldock, Murphy and Ughetta, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order denying appellants’ motion to dismiss the amended complaint pursuant to subdivision 4 of rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion granted. There is no present necessity for a declaratory judgment in an action to uphold an inchoate right of dower. (Buffington v. Mayper, 235 App. Div. 866.) Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Beldock, Murphy and Ughetta, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 A.D.2d 892, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/westerman-v-westerman-nyappdiv-1956.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack