Westerhoff v. Citizens Trust Co.

190 A. 88, 117 N.J.L. 453, 1937 N.J. LEXIS 202
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided January 22, 1937·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

*454 Per Curiam.

We concur in the view expressed by Judge Wolber that the indebtedness of the Nazzaros to the bankrupt, arising from the several transactions set out in the complaint, has been fully satisfied; and that, in respect of this issue, the plaintiff is concluded by the decree in Chancery. It is a corollary of this that the plaintiff has no right of action against the defendant.

The judgment is accordingly affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Case, Bodine, Heher, Perskie, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Cole, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Westerhoff v. Citizens Trust Co., 190 A. 88, 117 N.J.L. 453, 1937 N.J. LEXIS 202 (N.J. 1937).

190 A. 88 (Westerhoff v. Citizens Trust Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gelsmine v. Vignale
78 A.2d 602 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1951)