Westergren v. Commissioner of Public Safety

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Westergren v. Commissioner of Public Safety

349 N.W.2d 269, 1984 Minn. LEXIS 1367

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedJune 8, 1984

DocketNo. C8-83-777

StatusPublished

This text of 349 N.W.2d 269 (Westergren v. Commissioner of Public Safety) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Westergren v. Commissioner of Public Safety, 349 N.W.2d 269, 1984 Minn. LEXIS 1367 (Mich. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

YETKA, Justice.

Appellant Gary Westergren was stopped for driving while intoxicated on August 7, 1982. A sample of his breath indicated an alcohol concentration of .11%. Minn.Stat. § 169.123, subd. 4 (1982) provides that when a driver submits to chemical testing and the results indicate an alcohol concentration of .10% or more, the Commissioner of Public Safety shall revoke the driver’s license for 90 days. Westergren was served with a notice and order of revocation pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 169.123, subd. 5a (1982) informing him that his driver’s license was revoked effective in 7 days and of his right to seek administrative and judicial review.

On September 27, 1982, the Hennepin County Municipal Court conducted a hearing on Westergren’s petition for judicial review. Due to a misunderstanding between the court and Westergren’s counsel, the court failed to file its order within 14 days after the hearing as provided by Minn.Stat. § 169.123, subd. 6 (Supp.1983). Westergren moved for rescission of the revocation on the grounds that the court had failed to observe the statutory period. The municipal court denied his motion, and its decision was affirmed on appeal by a three-judge panel of the Hennepin County District Court.

We granted a discretionary appeal from the district court’s order. We now find that any order we might enter would be of no practical effect. If Westergren’s license revocation was effective August 14, 1982, the period of revocation had expired before he made his motion to rescind on December 10, 1982. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as moot. In re Consolidation of Glendale with Savage, 288 Minn. 340, 180 N.W.2d 925 (1970).

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

YETKA, Justice.

Appellant Gary Westergren was stopped for driving while intoxicated on August 7, 1982. A sample of his breath indicated an alcohol concentration of .11%. Minn.Stat. § 169.123, subd. 4 (1982) provides that when a driver submits to chemical testing and the results indicate an alcohol concentration of .10% or more, the Commissioner of Public Safety shall revoke the driver’s license for 90 days. Westergren was served with a notice and order of revocation pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 169.123, subd. 5a (1982) informing him that his driver’s license was revoked effective in 7 days and of his right to seek administrative and judicial review.

On September 27, 1982, the Hennepin County Municipal Court conducted a hearing on Westergren’s petition for judicial review. Due to a misunderstanding between the court and Westergren’s counsel, the court failed to file its order within 14 days after the hearing as provided by Minn.Stat. § 169.123, subd. 6 (Supp.1983). Westergren moved for rescission of the revocation on the grounds that the court had failed to observe the statutory period. The municipal court denied his motion, and its decision was affirmed on appeal by a three-judge panel of the Hennepin County District Court.

We granted a discretionary appeal from the district court’s order. We now find that any order we might enter would be of no practical effect. If Westergren’s license revocation was effective August 14, 1982, the period of revocation had expired before he made his motion to rescind on December 10, 1982. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as moot. In re Consolidation of Glendale with Savage, 288 Minn. 340, 180 N.W.2d 925 (1970).

Appeal dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

349 N.W.2d 269, 1984 Minn. LEXIS 1367, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/westergren-v-commissioner-of-public-safety-minn-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack