Westergard v. AMERICAN PENSION SERVICES LLC

2011 UT App 194, 259 P.3d 1071, 684 Utah Adv. Rep. 49, 2011 Utah App. LEXIS 192, 2011 WL 2413153

• Court: Court of Appeals of Utah
• Decided: June 16, 2011
• Docket: 20110169-CA
• Status: Published

Opinion

DECISION

PER CURIAM:

T1 American Pension Services (APS) appeals the district court's order entered on October 1, 2010. This matter is before the court on a sua sponte motion for summary disposition for lack of jurisdiction due to the absence of a final order. We dismiss the appeal without prejudice.

T 2 Generally, "[aln appeal is improper if it is taken from an order or judgment that is not final." Bradbury v. Valencia, 2000 UT 50, ¶ 9, 5 P.3d 649. Indeed, for an order or judgment to be final, it must "dispose of all parties or claims to an action." Id. 110. The only exceptions to the final judgment rule are where: (1) an appeal is permitted under the cireumstances by statute, (2) the appellate court grants interlocutory appeal under rule 5 of the Utah Rules of Appellate Procedure, or (8) the trial court certifies the order as final under rule 54(b) of the Utah Rules of Civil Procedure. See id. 112.

T8 The district court's October 1, 2010 order does not dispose of all parties or claims to the action. Furthermore, the October 1, 2010 order was not certified as a final, ap-pealable order pursuant to rule 54(b). APS fails to demonstrate that the October 1, 2010 order meets any exception to the final judgment rule Because the October 1, 2010 order is not final for purposes of appeal, this court is required to dismiss the appeal without prejudice. See id. 18.

T4 Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed without prejudice to the filing of a timely appeal from a final, appealable order.