Westcott v. New York State Board of Parole

256 A.D.2d 1179, 682 N.Y.S.2d 499, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14322
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 31, 1998
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 256 A.D.2d 1179 (Westcott v. New York State Board of Parole) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Westcott v. New York State Board of Parole, 256 A.D.2d 1179, 682 N.Y.S.2d 499, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14322 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

—Determination unanimously confirmed without costs and petition dismissed. Memorandum: Petitioner appeals from a final parole revocation determination by respondent New York [1180]*1180State Board of Parole (Board of Parole). Petitioner’s challenge to the finding of probable cause at the preliminary parole revocation hearing is rendered moot by the final parole revocation determination (see, People ex rel. Chavis v McCoy, 236 AD2d 892; Matter of Collins v Rodriguez, 138 AD2d 809). Although petitioner has statutory and due process rights to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses (see, Executive Law § 259-i [3] [f| [v]; Morrissey v Brewer, 408 US 471, 488-489; People ex rel. McGee v Walters, 62 NY2d 317, 319), petitioner did not object to the admission of hearsay statements of two witnesses, and failed to seek cross-examination of those witnesses. Thus, he waived his present argument that he was denied the opportunity to cross-examine those witnesses (see, People ex rel. Hall v Dufrain, 190 AD2d 917). Based upon the testimony of the witnesses, including petitioner, as well as petitioner’s plea of guilty with an explanation, we conclude that the determination of the Board of Parole that petitioner violated the conditions of his parole is supported by substantial evidence (see, Matter of Castro v Russi, 216 AD2d 968, lv denied 86 NY2d 711). (CPLR art 78 Proceeding Transferred by Order of Supreme Court, Livingston County, Cicoria, J.) Present — Pine, J. P., Hayes, Wisner, Pigott, Jr., and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

KALEIDA HEALTH, MTR. OF MARIA J.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015
In re Maria J.
129 A.D.3d 1660 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
Peek v. Dennison
39 A.D.3d 1239 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Mosley v. Dennison
30 A.D.3d 975 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
People ex rel. Ciccarelli v. Saxton
23 A.D.3d 1095 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Fuller v. Goord
299 A.D.2d 849 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Prodromidis v. McCoy
292 A.D.2d 769 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
People ex rel. Fryer v. Beaver
292 A.D.2d 876 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Weichert v. Ridgeway
283 A.D.2d 958 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Williams v. Lawrence
540 S.E.2d 599 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2001)
Lord v. State of New York Executive Department Board
263 A.D.2d 945 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
256 A.D.2d 1179, 682 N.Y.S.2d 499, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14322, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/westcott-v-new-york-state-board-of-parole-nyappdiv-1998.