Westcott Enterprises, Inc. v. Federal Mutual Insurance Company
This text of Westcott Enterprises, Inc. v. Federal Mutual Insurance Company (Westcott Enterprises, Inc. v. Federal Mutual Insurance Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 WESTCOTT ENTERPRISES, INC. Case No.: 20cv7-LAB (BGS) V2 Plaintiff, | ORDER RECHARACTERIZING 13 || V- MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE 14 || FEDERATED MUTUAL OPPOSITION 45 INSURANCE COMPANY, et al. 16 Defendants. 17 Plaintiff filed a noticed motion (Docket no. 18) for leave to file an opposition 18 ||to Defendant Brian Faulstich’s motion to dismiss. Rather than treat this as a 19 ||noticed motion, the Court will treat it as an ex parte request, and the hearing 20 ||currently on calendar on this motion is VACATED. In light of the strong policy 21 ||favoring decisions on the merits, see Eitel v. McCool, 782 F.2d 1470, 1472 (9" Cir. 22 ||1986), the Court would be inclined to grant the request. But if Defendants believe 23 request should be denied, they may file an opposition by April 24, 2020. 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 ||Dated: April 20, 2020 26 / it 4 □□ 27 Honorable Larry Alan Burns 28 Chief United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Westcott Enterprises, Inc. v. Federal Mutual Insurance Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/westcott-enterprises-inc-v-federal-mutual-insurance-company-casd-2020.