Westchester Store Fixtures Exchange, Inc. v. Baltic Estates, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Westchester Store Fixtures Exchange, Inc. v. Baltic Estates, Inc.

64 A.D.2d 663, 407 N.Y.S.2d 241, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12486

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 24, 1978

StatusPublished

This text of 64 A.D.2d 663 (Westchester Store Fixtures Exchange, Inc. v. Baltic Estates, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Westchester Store Fixtures Exchange, Inc. v. Baltic Estates, Inc., 64 A.D.2d 663, 407 N.Y.S.2d 241, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12486 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for the conversion of fixtures and equipment allegedly owned by the plaintiff seller under a conditional sales contract, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered September 21, 1977, which denied its motion for summary judgment. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements to defendant Baltic Estates, Inc. Special Term correctly found the presence of issues of fact requiring the denial of the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. Among the issues of fact to be decided at trial are: (1) whether there was a default by the purchaser under the conditional sales contract; (2) which items were included within said contract; and (3) which of these items remained in the subject premises after the purchaser under [664]*664the contract left the premises. Mollen, P. J., Hopkins, Titone and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for the conversion of fixtures and equipment allegedly owned by the plaintiff seller under a conditional sales contract, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered September 21, 1977, which denied its motion for summary judgment. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements to defendant Baltic Estates, Inc. Special Term correctly found the presence of issues of fact requiring the denial of the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. Among the issues of fact to be decided at trial are: (1) whether there was a default by the purchaser under the conditional sales contract; (2) which items were included within said contract; and (3) which of these items remained in the subject premises after the purchaser under [664]*664the contract left the premises. Mollen, P. J., Hopkins, Titone and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

64 A.D.2d 663, 407 N.Y.S.2d 241, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12486, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/westchester-store-fixtures-exchange-inc-v-baltic-estates-inc-nyappdiv-1978.