Westchester Stone, Sand & Gravel, Inc. v. Marcella

262 A.D.2d 403, 691 N.Y.S.2d 143, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6354
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 7, 1999
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 262 A.D.2d 403 (Westchester Stone, Sand & Gravel, Inc. v. Marcella) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Westchester Stone, Sand & Gravel, Inc. v. Marcella, 262 A.D.2d 403, 691 N.Y.S.2d 143, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6354 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for breach of an oral contract, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Rosato, J.), dated September 16, 1998, which, upon an order of the same court, entered July 14,. 1998, granting the respondents’ motion to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against them pursuant to CPLR 3015 (e) and 3211 (a) (7), is in favor of the respondents and against it. The notice of appeal from the order is deemed a premature notice of appeal from the judgment (see, CPLR 5520 [c]).

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

[404]*404The Administrative Code of the County of Westchester is applicable in this case, since by performing home improvement work on the respondents’ home in Westchester County, the plaintiff was clearly “conduct[ing]” or “engaging]” in a home improvement business there (Administrative Code of County of Westchester § 863.313). Even assuming that the respondent James J. Marcella may have been employed himself as a contractor or a builder, that fact would not render the code inapplicable to this situation. Inasmuch as the complaint does not allege that the plaintiff was licensed under the Administrative Code of the County of Westchester, the Supreme Court properly granted the respondents’ motion to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against them (see, CPLR 3015 [e]; 3211 [a] [7]; see also, Cappadona v Salman, 228 AD2d 632). Mangano, P. J., Santucci, Krausman, Florio and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cunningham v. Nolte
2020 NY Slip Op 06493 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
Kristeel, Inc. v. Seaview Dev. Corp.
2018 NY Slip Op 7296 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
Holistic Homes, LLC v. Greenfield
138 A.D.3d 689 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
CMC Quality Concrete III, LLC v. Indriolo
95 A.D.3d 924 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
Enko Construction Corp. v. Aronshtein
89 A.D.3d 676 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
J.G. Cerasuolo Construction, Inc. v. Tyler
35 A.D.3d 376 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Dickson v. Bonistall
19 A.D.3d 640 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
262 A.D.2d 403, 691 N.Y.S.2d 143, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6354, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/westchester-stone-sand-gravel-inc-v-marcella-nyappdiv-1999.