Westchester Pharmacy, Inc. v. Florida Board of Pharmacy

226 So. 2d 347
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 22, 1969·No. No. 69-223·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is denied. We find that the charges in the complaint were sufficiently specific to inform the permittee with reasonable certainty of the accusations against it so as to be given reasonable opportunity to defend against such charges. Petitioner was not deprived of due process of law nor has it demonstrated a departure from the essential requirements of law. Cf. Hickey v. Wells, Fla.1956, 91 So.2d 206; Robins v. Florida Real Estate Commission, Fla.App.1964, 162 So.2d 535.

McCAIN, REED and OWEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Westchester Pharmacy, Inc. v. Florida Board of Pharmacy, 226 So. 2d 347 (Fla. Ct. App. 1969).

226 So. 2d 347 (Westchester Pharmacy, Inc. v. Florida Board of Pharmacy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Robins v. Florida Real Estate Commission
162 So. 2d 535 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)
Hickey v. Wells
91 So. 2d 206 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1956)