Westchester Pharmacy, Inc. v. Florida Board of Pharmacy

226 So. 2d 347
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 22, 1969
DocketNo. 69-223
StatusPublished

This text of 226 So. 2d 347 (Westchester Pharmacy, Inc. v. Florida Board of Pharmacy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Westchester Pharmacy, Inc. v. Florida Board of Pharmacy, 226 So. 2d 347 (Fla. Ct. App. 1969).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is denied. We find that the charges in the complaint were sufficiently specific to inform the permittee with reasonable certainty of the accusations against it so as to be given reasonable opportunity to defend against such charges. Petitioner was not deprived of due process of law nor has it demonstrated a departure from the essential requirements of law. Cf. Hickey v. Wells, Fla.1956, 91 So.2d 206; Robins v. Florida Real Estate Commission, Fla.App.1964, 162 So.2d 535.

McCAIN, REED and OWEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Robins v. Florida Real Estate Commission
162 So. 2d 535 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)
Hickey v. Wells
91 So. 2d 206 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1956)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
226 So. 2d 347, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/westchester-pharmacy-inc-v-florida-board-of-pharmacy-fladistctapp-1969.