Westchester Joint Water Works No. 1 v. Stowell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Westchester Joint Water Works No. 1 v. Stowell

6 A.D.2d 888, 177 N.Y.S.2d 462, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5087

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 14, 1958

StatusPublished

This text of 6 A.D.2d 888 (Westchester Joint Water Works No. 1 v. Stowell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Westchester Joint Water Works No. 1 v. Stowell, 6 A.D.2d 888, 177 N.Y.S.2d 462, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5087 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

In a condemnation proceeding, the appeal is from an order which (a) granted respondent’s motion to take immediate possession of the subject premises and devote them temporarily to the public use specified in the petition, and (b) denied appellant’s cross motion to dismiss the petition on the ground that it is insufficient in law on its face (Rules Civ. Prac., rule 106, subd. 4). Appeal dismissed, without costs. In a condemnation proceeding under the Condemnation Law an intermediate order may be brought up for appellate review only on an appeal from the final order. Hence, until the entry of the final order no appeal will properly lie from any intermediate order (Condemnation Law, § 19; cf. Matter of Board of Transp. of New York [Early], 272 N. Y. 52; Matter of County of Nassau [Renn], 281 App. Div. 1032). The merits of the appeal have been examined, however, and if the appeal were not being dismissed the order would be affirmed. Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Murphy, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a condemnation proceeding, the appeal is from an order which (a) granted respondent’s motion to take immediate possession of the subject premises and devote them temporarily to the public use specified in the petition, and (b) denied appellant’s cross motion to dismiss the petition on the ground that it is insufficient in law on its face (Rules Civ. Prac., rule 106, subd. 4). Appeal dismissed, without costs. In a condemnation proceeding under the Condemnation Law an intermediate order may be brought up for appellate review only on an appeal from the final order. Hence, until the entry of the final order no appeal will properly lie from any intermediate order (Condemnation Law, § 19; cf. Matter of Board of Transp. of New York [Early], 272 N. Y. 52; Matter of County of Nassau [Renn], 281 App. Div. 1032). The merits of the appeal have been examined, however, and if the appeal were not being dismissed the order would be affirmed. Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Murphy, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 A.D.2d 888, 177 N.Y.S.2d 462, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5087, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/westchester-joint-water-works-no-1-v-stowell-nyappdiv-1958.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack