Westchester County Healthcare Corp. v. County of Westchester

19 A.D.3d 405, 796 N.Y.S.2d 129

This text of 19 A.D.3d 405 (Westchester County Healthcare Corp. v. County of Westchester) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Westchester County Healthcare Corp. v. County of Westchester, 19 A.D.3d 405, 796 N.Y.S.2d 129 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

[406]*406In an action, inter alia, to recover for damage to property, the plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Donovan, J.), entered February 5, 2004, as granted that branch of the defendant’s motion which was pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (1) and (7) to dismiss those portions of the complaint asserting claims to recover for damages to the main hospital building and the Macy Pavilion.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Contrary to the plaintiffs contention, the duty owed by the defendant to it was not “completely extraneous to any duty or obligation” arising out of the landlord/tenant relationship created by the lease agreement (Interested Underwriters at Lloyds v Ducor’s, Inc., 103 AD2d 76, 77 [1984], affd 65 NY2d 647 [1985]), as the lease explicitly conferred upon the defendant the duty to supply the plaintiff with water. As such, the terms of the lease between the parties, including those involving waiver and release of claims, are applicable in this case (cf. Interested Underwriters at Lloyds v Ducor’s, Inc., supra). The plaintiff waived its claims for the damages it sustained to its personal property. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted that branch of the defendant’s motion which was pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (1) and (7) to dismiss those portions of the complaint asserting claims for damages to the main hospital building and the Macy Pavilion, as those buildings were subject to the lease between the parties. Schmidt, J.P., Adams, Luciano and Rivera, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Interested Underwriters at Lloyds v. Ducor's, Inc.
103 A.D.2d 76 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
19 A.D.3d 405, 796 N.Y.S.2d 129, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/westchester-county-healthcare-corp-v-county-of-westchester-nyappdiv-2005.