Westchester Asbestos Co. v. Freyn Bros. of Mich., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Westchester Asbestos Co. v. Freyn Bros. of Mich., Inc.

252 A.D. 787, 299 N.Y.S. 156, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6295

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 22, 1937

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 252 A.D. 787 (Westchester Asbestos Co. v. Freyn Bros. of Mich., Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Westchester Asbestos Co. v. Freyn Bros. of Mich., Inc., 252 A.D. 787, 299 N.Y.S. 156, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6295 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

This action for the foreclosure of a mechanic’s lien arose in a contract, represented by writings, whereby the plaintiff agreed to do certain work on pipe covering and insulation in the heating contract awarded to the defendant-appellant by the State for the construction of the Hudson River Hospital. The terms in respect to payments were definite, and that said defendant so understood and interpreted them is indicated by its payments in certain months when the work was performed. Then it failed to make its payments as agreed and eventually the plaintiff refused to complete the work because of this breach of the contract. Subsequently it filed a lien; and the amount due thereon has been found by the trial court, which also made findings of fact on other disputed issues. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Carswell, Davis, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This action for the foreclosure of a mechanic’s lien arose in a contract, represented by writings, whereby the plaintiff agreed to do certain work on pipe covering and insulation in the heating contract awarded to the defendant-appellant by the State for the construction of the Hudson River Hospital. The terms in respect to payments were definite, and that said defendant so understood and interpreted them is indicated by its payments in certain months when the work was performed. Then it failed to make its payments as agreed and eventually the plaintiff refused to complete the work because of this breach of the contract. Subsequently it filed a lien; and the amount due thereon has been found by the trial court, which also made findings of fact on other disputed issues. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Carswell, Davis, Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

252 A.D. 787, 299 N.Y.S. 156, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6295, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/westchester-asbestos-co-v-freyn-bros-of-mich-inc-nyappdiv-1937.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack