Westbrook v. . Williams

179 S.E. 2, 208 N.C. 821, 1935 N.C. LEXIS 144
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided March 20, 1935·Published

Opinion

Pee Cueiam.

There is no evidence appearing in tbe record in tbis appeal tending to show tbat tbe mule described in tbe complaint is now or was at tbe commencement of tbis action in tbe possession of tbe defendant Henry Brady, as alleged in tbe complaint. For tbat reason, tbe plaintiff is not entitled to recover in tbis action of tbe defendant Henry Brady.

There is no error in tbe judgment dismissing tbe action as to tbe defendant Henry Brady. Tbe judgment is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Westbrook v. . Williams, 179 S.E. 2, 208 N.C. 821, 1935 N.C. LEXIS 144 (N.C. 1935).

179 S.E. 2 (Westbrook v. . Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.