Westbrook v. . Williams

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Westbrook v. . Williams

179 S.E. 2, 208 N.C. 821, 1935 N.C. LEXIS 144

DecidedMarch 20, 1935

StatusPublished

This text of 179 S.E. 2 (Westbrook v. . Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Westbrook v. . Williams, 179 S.E. 2, 208 N.C. 821, 1935 N.C. LEXIS 144 (N.C. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Cueiam.

There is no evidence appearing in tbe record in tbis appeal tending to show tbat tbe mule described in tbe complaint is now or was at tbe commencement of tbis action in tbe possession of tbe defendant Henry Brady, as alleged in tbe complaint. For tbat reason, tbe plaintiff is not entitled to recover in tbis action of tbe defendant Henry Brady.

There is no error in tbe judgment dismissing tbe action as to tbe defendant Henry Brady. Tbe judgment is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Cueiam.

There is no evidence appearing in tbe record in tbis appeal tending to show tbat tbe mule described in tbe complaint is now or was at tbe commencement of tbis action in tbe possession of tbe defendant Henry Brady, as alleged in tbe complaint. For tbat reason, tbe plaintiff is not entitled to recover in tbis action of tbe defendant Henry Brady.

There is no error in tbe judgment dismissing tbe action as to tbe defendant Henry Brady. Tbe judgment is

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

179 S.E. 2, 208 N.C. 821, 1935 N.C. LEXIS 144, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/westbrook-v-williams-nc-1935.