Westbrook v. Van Auken
This text of 5 N.J.L. 478 (Westbrook v. Van Auken) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion of the Court.
The state of demand claims 63 dollars, for twenty-one different violations of the law, entitled “ An act to ascertain the toll of millers, passed the 25th of May 1799,” and gives the necessary specifications of time, &c. The jury found a verdict, “ that the defendant oweth the plaintiff eighteen dollars, debt, and six- cents, costs.” And the judgment was “ for the plaintiff, for the said sum of eighteen dollars, debt, it being for six several offences, and six dollars and ninety-six cents, costs.”
The objection taken, is to the verdict and judgment; that they do not specif}' the offences for which they were, given ; and the objection is well founded. The particular offences on which the conviction is had, should have been specified in the verdict. Pen. 411, 412, 928, 1007. Cro. Jac. 953.
Let the judgment be reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
5 N.J.L. 478, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/westbrook-v-van-auken-nj-1819.