Westbrook v. United States
Opinion
Larnette M. Westbrook, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. Because Westbrook’s general objections failed to object to the findings made by the magistrate judge with sufficient specificity, we conclude he has waived appellate review of his claims. See United States v. Midgette, 478 F.Sd 616, 622 (4th Cir.2007). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
252 F. App'x 542 (Westbrook v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.