Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Westbrook v. State

Westbrook v. State

773 So. 2d 1268, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 16848, 2000 WL 1873022
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 27, 2000
DocketNo. 2D00-2608
StatusPublished

This text of 773 So. 2d 1268 (Westbrook v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Westbrook v. State, 773 So. 2d 1268, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 16848, 2000 WL 1873022 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Gregory S. Westbrook appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct an illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We affirm the trial court’s order. This affir-mance is, however, without prejudice to Westbrook raising his claims regarding gain time through administrative channels of the Department of Corrections, see Clements v. State, 761 So.2d 1245 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000), and, if necessary, by filing a petition for writ of mandamus in the appropriate circuit court, see Newsome v. Singletary, 637 So.2d 9 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994).

Affirmed.

PARKER, A.C.J., and WHATLEY and CASANUEVA, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Newsome v. Singletary
637 So. 2d 9 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Clements v. State
761 So. 2d 1245 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
773 So. 2d 1268, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 16848, 2000 WL 1873022, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/westbrook-v-state-fladistctapp-2000.