Westbrook v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Westbrook v. State

64 So. 2d 320, 1953 Fla. LEXIS 1192

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedFebruary 6, 1953

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 64 So. 2d 320 (Westbrook v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Westbrook v. State, 64 So. 2d 320, 1953 Fla. LEXIS 1192 (Fla. 1953).

Pincite

Opinion

ROBERTS, Justice.

The appellant was tried jointly with one Primus Johnson for the murder of one James Blaine and was convicted of murder in the second degree. Johnson was convicted of murder in the first degree, with a recommendation of mercy, and has not appealed from the judgment of conviction. The appellant’s motion for a severance and separate trial was denied by the trial judge, as was his motion for new trial which included the denial-of such motion as one of the grounds therefor. The appellant here contends that it was error to force him to go to trial jointly with the defendant Johnson and that the. evidence was insufficient to support his conviction of murder in the second degree.

The evidence- adduced against the appellant was, indeed, meager and inconclusive, and the jury may- well have been influenced in its verdict against him by the fact that he was tried jointly with Johnson. While the denial of the motion for severance, standing alone, might not be reversible error, when considered in connection with the meager evidence against this defendant, we think that the ends of justice will be best served by awarding a new trial to the appellant, and that the trial judge erred in refusing to do so.

Accordingly, the judgment appealed from is reversed and,the cause remanded for a new trial.

HOBSON, C. J., and MATHEWS and DREW, JJ., concur. TERRELL, THOMAS and SEBRING, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ROBERTS, Justice.

The appellant was tried jointly with one Primus Johnson for the murder of one James Blaine and was convicted of murder in the second degree. Johnson was convicted of murder in the first degree, with a recommendation of mercy, and has not appealed from the judgment of conviction. The appellant’s motion for a severance and separate trial was denied by the trial judge, as was his motion for new trial which included the denial-of such motion as one of the grounds therefor. The appellant here contends that it was error to force him to go to trial jointly with the defendant Johnson and that the. evidence was insufficient to support his conviction of murder in the second degree.

The evidence- adduced against the appellant was, indeed, meager and inconclusive, and the jury may- well have been influenced in its verdict against him by the fact that he was tried jointly with Johnson. While the denial of the motion for severance, standing alone, might not be reversible error, when considered in connection with the meager evidence against this defendant, we think that the ends of justice will be best served by awarding a new trial to the appellant, and that the trial judge erred in refusing to do so.

Accordingly, the judgment appealed from is reversed and,the cause remanded for a new trial.

HOBSON, C. J., and MATHEWS and DREW, JJ., concur. TERRELL, THOMAS and SEBRING, JJ., dissent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

64 So. 2d 320, 1953 Fla. LEXIS 1192, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/westbrook-v-state-fla-1953.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack