Westbrook v. State
This text of 2015 Ark. App. 635 (Westbrook v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Cite as 2015 Ark. App. 635
ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION I No. CR-15-155
Opinion Delivered November 4, 2015
BRANDON ULYSSES WESTBROOK APPEAL FROM THE PULASKI APPELLANT COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, FIRST DIVISION V. [NO. 60CR-11-1138]
STATE OF ARKANSAS HONORABLE LEON JOHNSON, APPELLEE JUDGE
SUPPLEMENTAL ADDENDUM ORDERED
WAYMOND M. BROWN, Judge
A Pulaski County jury convicted appellant Brandon Westbrook of two counts of first-
degree murder and one count of attempted first-degree murder. He was sentenced as a
habitual offender to forty-five years’ imprisonment. Appellant argues on appeal that the trial
court abused its discretion “in refusing to admit into evidence expert medical testimony and
lay-person testimony proffered by appellant Westbrook to establish his controlled substance
induced psychosis as the cause for making false confessions on February 10, 2011, to have
committed the first degree murders and the attempted first degree murder at issue.” We do
not reach the merits of appellant’s argument due to deficiencies in the addendum. Cite as 2015 Ark. App. 635
Arkansas Supreme Court Rule 4-2(a)(8)1 requires that the addendum to the appellant’s
brief contain copies of non-transcript documents in the record on appeal that are essential for
the appellate court to confirm its jurisdiction, understand the case, and decide the issues on
appeal, including exhibits such as CDs and DVDs. Here, appellant has failed to include the
DVD played for the jury and admitted as an exhibit during his jury trial in the addendum.2
He has also failed to include his prior convictions in the addendum. We direct appellant to
file a supplemental addendum within seven calendar days of this opinion.3 We encourage
counsel to review our rules to ensure that no other deficiencies are present.
Supplemental addendum ordered.
GLOVER and WHITEAKER, JJ., agree.
Llewellyn J. Marczuk, Deputy Public Defender, by: Clint Miller, Deputy Public Defender, for appellant.
Leslie Rutledge, Att’y Gen., by: Evelyn D. Gomez, Ass’t Att’y Gen., for appellee.
1 (2014). 2 We note that the volume on the DVD was muted; however, it is still necessary for appellant to provide this court with copies of the DVD. 3 Arkansas Supreme Court Rule 4-2(b)(4).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2015 Ark. App. 635, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/westbrook-v-state-arkctapp-2015.