Westbrook v. Fudge
This text of 1 Ga. L. Rep. 50 (Westbrook v. Fudge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On the call of this case, counsel for plaintiff in error moved to withdraw the writ of error, stating that the case had been settled between the parties. Counsel for defendant in error objected and insisted on opening the record and asking for damages. It was not denied that terms of settlement had been agreed on, but it was stated that the money had not been paid by the plaintiff in error according to the agreement.
Held, that it is doubtful whether, under such circumstances, dam[51]*51ages would be awarded, irrespective of the merits of the case. But looking into this record, it does not appear that the case was brought up for delay only, and damages are denied.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Ga. L. Rep. 50, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/westbrook-v-fudge-ga-1885.