Westbrook v. Dubois

New York Supreme Court

Westbrook v. Dubois

3 How. Pr. 26

DecidedFebruary 15, 1847

StatusPublished

This text of 3 How. Pr. 26 (Westbrook v. Dubois) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Westbrook v. Dubois, 3 How. Pr. 26 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1847).

Pincite

Opinion

Beardsley, Justice

Denied the motion with costs, on the ground that the motion should not have been noticed to Defendant; he had nothing to do with the settlement of the case by the referees; the present referees should settle the case; there were no sufficient grounds stated for substituting others for that purpose.

The Plaintiff was allowed an ex parte order, requiring the referees to settle the case, or show cause, &c.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Beardsley, Justice

Denied the motion with costs, on the ground that the motion should not have been noticed to Defendant; he had nothing to do with the settlement of the case by the referees; the present referees should settle the case; there were no sufficient grounds stated for substituting others for that purpose.

The Plaintiff was allowed an ex parte order, requiring the referees to settle the case, or show cause, &c.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 How. Pr. 26, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/westbrook-v-dubois-nysupct-1847.