Westbrook v. Dallas County

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJune 20, 2025
Docket24-10942
StatusUnpublished

This text of Westbrook v. Dallas County (Westbrook v. Dallas County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Westbrook v. Dallas County, (5th Cir. 2025).

Opinion

Case: 24-10942 Document: 131-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/20/2025

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED June 20, 2025 No. 24-10942 Lyle W. Cayce ____________ Clerk

Lula Westbrook,

Plaintiff—Appellant,

versus

Dallas County; John Wiley Price,

Defendants—Appellees. ______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:24-CV-1734 ______________________________

Before Jones, Duncan, and Douglas, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam: * Lula Westbrook moves for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal from the dismissal of her civil action. By moving this court for leave to proceed IFP, Westbrook is challenging the district court’s determination that her appeal is not taken in good faith. See Baugh v. Taylor, 117 F.3d 197, 202 (5th Cir. 1997).

_____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. Case: 24-10942 Document: 131-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/20/2025

No. 24-10942

“This [c]ourt must examine the basis of its jurisdiction, on its own motion, if necessary.” Mosley v. Cozby, 813 F.2d 659, 660 (5th Cir. 1987). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007). Because Westbrook did not file a timely notice of appeal from the district court’s judgment dismissing her civil action, this court lacks jurisdiction over the instant appeal. See id.; Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A). Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. Westbrook’s IFP motion is DENIED as moot. Her motions for the appointment of counsel and her motions seeking transfer of the instant appeal are likewise DENIED. Any remaining motions or requests for relief are also DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bowles v. Russell
551 U.S. 205 (Supreme Court, 2007)
Marion Ray Mosley v. Officer M.D. Cozby
813 F.2d 659 (Fifth Circuit, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Westbrook v. Dallas County, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/westbrook-v-dallas-county-ca5-2025.