Westbrook, Nicholas

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 20, 2013
DocketWR-77,413-02
StatusPublished

This text of Westbrook, Nicholas (Westbrook, Nicholas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Westbrook, Nicholas, (Tex. 2013).

Opinion



IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS



NO. WR-77,413-02
EX PARTE NICHOLAS WESTBROOK, Applicant


ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 24456-A(1) IN THE 42ND DISTRICT COURT

FROM TAYLOR COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R



Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of engaging in organized criminal activity and sentenced to six years' imprisonment. He did not appeal his conviction.

Applicant complains that his trial counsel was ineffective because counsel should have filed a motion to suppress the evidence seized from his motel room after a warantless search of it was conducted. He alleges that he would not have pled guilty if counsel had investigated to learn that such a motion would have had merit. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court shall obtain a response from Applicant's trial counsel addressing the claim that a motion to suppress should have been filed and detailing counsel's representation of and advice to Applicant. To obtain the response, the trial court may use any means set out in Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.07, § 3(d). In the appropriate case, the trial court may rely on its personal recollection. Id.

If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 26.04.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law in regard to Applicant's claim that his trial counsel was ineffective and that his guilty plea was involuntary. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant's claim for habeas corpus relief.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter's notes from any hearing or deposition, along with the trial court's supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall be obtained from this Court.



Filed: March 20, 2013

Do not publish



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Rodriguez
334 S.W.2d 294 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1960)
Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Westbrook, Nicholas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/westbrook-nicholas-texcrimapp-2013.