Westberry v. State

176 S.E. 917, 50 Ga. App. 23, 1934 Ga. App. LEXIS 606
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedOctober 26, 1934
Docket23992
StatusPublished

This text of 176 S.E. 917 (Westberry v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Westberry v. State, 176 S.E. 917, 50 Ga. App. 23, 1934 Ga. App. LEXIS 606 (Ga. Ct. App. 1934).

Opinion

MacIntyre, J.

Under the ruling of the Supreme Court in Boyd v. State, 156 Ga. 48 (118 S. E. 705), the verdict in the instant case is not void for repugnancy; and the evidence supports that verdict.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Guerry, J., concur. Hubert F. Rawls, for plaintiff in error. A. B. Spence, solicitor-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Boyd v. State
118 S.E. 705 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1923)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
176 S.E. 917, 50 Ga. App. 23, 1934 Ga. App. LEXIS 606, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/westberry-v-state-gactapp-1934.