Westall v. Atlas Supply Co.

198 N.C. 112
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedDecember 18, 1929
StatusPublished

This text of 198 N.C. 112 (Westall v. Atlas Supply Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Westall v. Atlas Supply Co., 198 N.C. 112 (N.C. 1929).

Opinion

Stacy, C. J.,

after stating the case: The trial court held, as a matter of law, that the plaintiff was entitled to recover the balance due under the contract, i. $300 per month for eleven months, “less any sum that the plaintiff might have realized by the exercise of ordinary diligence in [114]*114renting or leasing tbe property to some one else.” Monger v. Lutterloh, 195 N. C., 274, 142 S. E., 12. In tbis, we think there was error.

As to whether there was a surrender and acceptance of the tenement when the plaintiff received the keys through the mails, accompanied by defendant’s letter of 9 February, 1928, and kept them without further comment, is a question presented by the evidence, determinable alone by the jury. 16 R. C. L., 1154; Note, 18 A. L. R., 957.

New trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Monger v. . Lutterloh
142 S.E. 12 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1928)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
198 N.C. 112, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/westall-v-atlas-supply-co-nc-1929.