West Virginia Pulp & Paper Co. v. Bowers

S.D. New York

West Virginia Pulp & Paper Co. v. Bowers

293 F. 144, 1 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) 81, 4 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 3633, 1923 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1214

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York

DecidedAugust 1, 1923

StatusPublished

Cited by9 cases

This text of 293 F. 144 (West Virginia Pulp & Paper Co. v. Bowers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

West Virginia Pulp & Paper Co. v. Bowers, 293 F. 144, 1 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) 81, 4 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 3633, 1923 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1214 (S.D.N.Y. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

KNO'X, District Judge.

In a case such as this, there is little use for a court of first instance to enter upon a discussion of its views as to the interpretation to be placed upon a particular taxing statute. Any decision of mine will be but a conduit through which a more authoritative ruling will be had, and for such reason I forbear to elaborate upon my conclusions. It is enough to say that in my judgment the acts of plaintiff giving rise to the assessment of the tax in question are not within the purview of the statute upon which defendant relies. What plaintiff did, in my opinion, is not to be regarded as an original issuance of stock, either upon organization or reorganization. No essential change in the capital with which plaintiff does business has taken place, and the rights of its stockholders have been neither increased nor lessened. They continue to hold their respective portions of the original issue of stock, save that such portions are now evidenced by an increased number of pieces of paper, and these they may have without their corporation being subjected to the tax assessed against it.

Defendant’s motion for judgment of dismissal is denied, and, unless defendant desires to litigate the allegations of fact set up in the complaint, there is no reason why plaintiff should not have judgment for the sum sued for.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

KNO'X, District Judge.

In a case such as this, there is little use for a court of first instance to enter upon a discussion of its views as to the interpretation to be placed upon a particular taxing statute. Any decision of mine will be but a conduit through which a more authoritative ruling will be had, and for such reason I forbear to elaborate upon my conclusions. It is enough to say that in my judgment the acts of plaintiff giving rise to the assessment of the tax in question are not within the purview of the statute upon which defendant relies. What plaintiff did, in my opinion, is not to be regarded as an original issuance of stock, either upon organization or reorganization. No essential change in the capital with which plaintiff does business has taken place, and the rights of its stockholders have been neither increased nor lessened. They continue to hold their respective portions of the original issue of stock, save that such portions are now evidenced by an increased number of pieces of paper, and these they may have without their corporation being subjected to the tax assessed against it.

Defendant’s motion for judgment of dismissal is denied, and, unless defendant desires to litigate the allegations of fact set up in the complaint, there is no reason why plaintiff should not have judgment for the sum sued for.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

293 F. 144, 1 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) 81, 4 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 3633, 1923 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1214, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/west-virginia-pulp-paper-co-v-bowers-nysd-1923.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack