West Virginia CWP Fund v. Reed
Opinion
West Virginia CWP Fund petitions for review of the Benefits Review Board’s decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s award of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C. §§ 901-945 (2012). Our review of the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. W. Va. CWP Fund v. Reed, No. 11-0707-BLA (B.R.B. Aug. 30, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
575 F. App'x 128 (West Virginia CWP Fund v. Reed) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.