West Virginia Consolidated Public Retirement Board v. Benny Jones
This text of West Virginia Consolidated Public Retirement Board v. Benny Jones (West Virginia Consolidated Public Retirement Board v. Benny Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering West Virginia Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
No. 13-0937 – WV Consolidated Public Retirement Board v. Benny Jones
FILED June 11, 2014 released at 3:00 p.m.
RORY L. PERRY II, CLERK
SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS
OF WEST VIRGINIA
Justice Ketchum, dissenting:
The Retirement Board is equitably estopped from denying Mr. Jones
eligibility to participate in PERS.
When Mr. Jones began working for the Raleigh County Emergency Service
Authority, he was accepted by PERS into their retirement system. PERS even wrote Mr.
Jones and acknowledged that he had returned to the employment of a participating PERS
employer. In addition, PERS accepted his monthly retirement contributions for over ten
years. It was not until he vested for PERS retirement benefits that he was notified by
PERS that he was ineligible.
There is no doubt that the Retirement Board is equitably estopped from
denying Mr. Jones benefits under the factors set out in Hudkins v. Public Retirement Bd.,
220 W.Va. 275, 647 S.E.2d 711 (2007). The Board informed Mr. Jones, in writing, that
he was working for a participating employer and accepted his contributions until he
became vested and, only then, declared him ineligible for benefits.
Therefore, I dissent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
West Virginia Consolidated Public Retirement Board v. Benny Jones, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/west-virginia-consolidated-public-retirement-board-wva-2014.