West Virginia Ass'n of Rehabilitation Facilities v. Department of Administration

West Virginia Court of Claims

West Virginia Ass'n of Rehabilitation Facilities v. Department of Administration

23 Ct. Cl. 15

CourtWest Virginia Court of Claims

DecidedAugust 24, 1999

DocketCC-98-395

StatusPublished

This text of 23 Ct. Cl. 15 (West Virginia Ass'n of Rehabilitation Facilities v. Department of Administration) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering West Virginia Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

West Virginia Ass'n of Rehabilitation Facilities v. Department of Administration, 23 Ct. Cl. 15 (W. Va. Super. Ct. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

This claim was submitted for decision based upon the allegations in the Notice of Claim and respondent's Answer.

Claimant seeks $27.62 for providing bulk mailing services to respondent’s office at the West Virginia Capitol Building in Charleston. The documentation for these services was not processed for payment within the appropriate fiscal year; therefore, the claimant has not been paid. In the Answer, respondent admits the validity of the claim as well as the amount, and states that there were sufficient funds expired in the appropriate fiscal year from which the claim could have been paid.

Accordingly, in view of the foregoing, the Court hereby makes the following award.

Award of $27.62.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

This claim was submitted for decision based upon the allegations in the Notice of Claim and respondent's Answer.

Claimant seeks $27.62 for providing bulk mailing services to respondent’s office at the West Virginia Capitol Building in Charleston. The documentation for these services was not processed for payment within the appropriate fiscal year; therefore, the claimant has not been paid. In the Answer, respondent admits the validity of the claim as well as the amount, and states that there were sufficient funds expired in the appropriate fiscal year from which the claim could have been paid.

Accordingly, in view of the foregoing, the Court hereby makes the following award.

Award of $27.62.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

23 Ct. Cl. 15, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/west-virginia-assn-of-rehabilitation-facilities-v-department-of-wvctcl-1999.