West v. West

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

West v. West

61 A.D.2d 841, 402 N.Y.S.2d 420, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10311

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 27, 1978

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 61 A.D.2d 841 (West v. West) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

West v. West, 61 A.D.2d 841, 402 N.Y.S.2d 420, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10311 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

In a matrimonial action in which the plaintiff had previously been granted a judgment of [842]*842divorce, defendant appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated October 15, 1976, which, inter alia, denied his cross motion to terminate alimony payments and (2) the judgment of the same court, entered thereon on November 30, 1976. Appeal from the order dismissed, without costs or disbursements (see Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241, 248). Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. On the record before this court, the defendant did not meet his burden of proving that plaintiff’s relationship with another met the standard by which the court could modify the judgment by annulling the alimony provisions thereof (see Domestic Relations Law, § 248; Northrup v Northrup, 43 NY2d 566). Suozzi, J. P., Gulotta, Margett and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a matrimonial action in which the plaintiff had previously been granted a judgment of [842]*842divorce, defendant appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated October 15, 1976, which, inter alia, denied his cross motion to terminate alimony payments and (2) the judgment of the same court, entered thereon on November 30, 1976. Appeal from the order dismissed, without costs or disbursements (see Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241, 248). Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. On the record before this court, the defendant did not meet his burden of proving that plaintiff’s relationship with another met the standard by which the court could modify the judgment by annulling the alimony provisions thereof (see Domestic Relations Law, § 248; Northrup v Northrup, 43 NY2d 566). Suozzi, J. P., Gulotta, Margett and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

61 A.D.2d 841, 402 N.Y.S.2d 420, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10311, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/west-v-west-nyappdiv-1978.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack