West v. Stynchcombe

317 S.E.2d 541, 253 Ga. 135, 1984 Ga. LEXIS 847
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJuly 2, 1984
Docket40946
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 317 S.E.2d 541 (West v. Stynchcombe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
West v. Stynchcombe, 317 S.E.2d 541, 253 Ga. 135, 1984 Ga. LEXIS 847 (Ga. 1984).

Opinion

Weltner, Justice.

West purchased at sheriff’s sale certain real property, which was levied upon and sold to satisfy two fi. fas. issued by the Fulton County Public Works Department upon unpaid sewer assessments. Because of certain irregularities in the sale, West contends that he is entitled to the delivery of the fi. fas. with no entry of satisfaction, as well as a sheriff’s deed to the property.

West relies upon OCGA § 48-3-19, pertaining to tax executions. Such executions may be transferred independent of public sale, and prior to levy. However, the sale in this case proceeded under OCGA § 48-5-358, relating to assessments for public improvement purposes, which contains no provision for the transfer of fi. fas. independent of sale.

West’s rights must be consistent with the provisions of OCGA § 48-5-358. Hence, he is entitled to either a sheriff’s deed which accurately states the circumstances of the sale, or to the return of his money with lawful interest. As he is not entitled to the fi. fas., as [136]*136demanded, the judgment of the trial court denying mandamus absolute is affirmed.

Decided July 2, 1984. Durwood T. Pye, for appellant. Lewis C. Horne, Jr., Robert G. Young, for appellee.

Within thirty days from the return of the remittitur, West may elect, in writing, to receive either a corrected sheriffs deed, or the return of the purchase price with legal interest, and the county shall comply with such election within thirty days from receipt.

Judgment affirmed with directions.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

HARPAGON CO., LLC v. Freeman
640 S.E.2d 268 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2007)
Monticello, Ltd. v. City of Atlanta
499 S.E.2d 157 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
317 S.E.2d 541, 253 Ga. 135, 1984 Ga. LEXIS 847, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/west-v-stynchcombe-ga-1984.