West v. State

1931 OK CR 60, 296 P. 506, 50 Okla. Crim. 91, 1931 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 56
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
DecidedFebruary 7, 1931
DocketNo. A-7788.
StatusPublished

This text of 1931 OK CR 60 (West v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
West v. State, 1931 OK CR 60, 296 P. 506, 50 Okla. Crim. 91, 1931 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 56 (Okla. Ct. App. 1931).

Opinion

EDW ADS, J.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called d ^endant, was convicted in the county court of Lin- ^ coin /iinty on a charge of having the unlawful possession i of vhisky, and was sentenced to pay a fine of f 100 and to serve 60 days in the county jail.

The record discloses that at the time charged certain officers with a search warrant went to the residence of defendant and made a search, finding about a quart of whisky. There was considerable evidence that this place of resi-Idence was a place where persons both black and white resorted for the purpose of buying and drinking intoxicating liquor, and also that it bore a reputation as a place where liquors were sold.

The principal contention made is that the evidence is insufficient, and that the court erred in admitting evidence of the reputation of the place. A predicate having been laid by showing the residence of defendant was a place of resort, the evidence of reputation was admissible.

The case is affirmed.

DAVENPORT, P. J., and CHAPPELL, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1931 OK CR 60, 296 P. 506, 50 Okla. Crim. 91, 1931 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 56, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/west-v-state-oklacrimapp-1931.