West v. State

566 S.W.3d 268
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 29, 2019
DocketWD 81214
StatusPublished

This text of 566 S.W.3d 268 (West v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
West v. State, 566 S.W.3d 268 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Wayne West appeals, following an evidentiary hearing, the denial of his amended Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief, in which he argued that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to investigate and produce witnesses regarding the presence of other individuals at or near the scene of the crime when it occurred. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
566 S.W.3d 268, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/west-v-state-moctapp-2019.