West v. State
333 S.W.3d 533, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 317, 2011 WL 865461
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in West v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1007 →
Opinion
ORDER
Neysa M. West appeals from the denial of her Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.
Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
West v. State, 333 S.W.3d 533, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 317, 2011 WL 865461 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).
333 S.W.3d 533 (West v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.