West v. State

462 A.2d 1198, 296 Md. 413, 1983 Md. LEXIS 269
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedAugust 9, 1983
DocketNo. 57
StatusPublished

This text of 462 A.2d 1198 (West v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
West v. State, 462 A.2d 1198, 296 Md. 413, 1983 Md. LEXIS 269 (Md. 1983).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

We granted certiorari in this case to consider the single question of whether the trial court erred in imposing a mandatory sentence upon the petitioner pursuant to the provision of Maryland Code (1957, 1976 Repl. Vol., 1980 Cum. Supp.), Art. 27, § 643B (c).

For the reasons stated in Raiford v. State, 296 Md. 289, 462 A.2d 1192 (1983) sentence in this case must be vacated and the case remanded for a new sentencing hearing.

Sentence vacated and case remanded to the Court of Special Appeals with instructions to remand to the Circuit Court for Baltimore City for a new sentencing hearing.

Costs to be paid by Mayor and City Council of Baltimore.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Raiford v. State
462 A.2d 1192 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
462 A.2d 1198, 296 Md. 413, 1983 Md. LEXIS 269, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/west-v-state-md-1983.