West v. State

466 S.E.2d 854, 266 Ga. 290, 96 Fulton County D. Rep. 612, 1996 Ga. LEXIS 84
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 19, 1996
DocketS96A0017
StatusPublished

This text of 466 S.E.2d 854 (West v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
West v. State, 466 S.E.2d 854, 266 Ga. 290, 96 Fulton County D. Rep. 612, 1996 Ga. LEXIS 84 (Ga. 1996).

Opinion

Hunstein, Justice.

Marquis Bernard West was found guilty of murder and armed robbery and was sentenced to two consecutive life terms.1 He appeals from the denial of his motion for a new trial.

1. The evidence established that in early June 1992, West and a friend, Samuels, purchased a .357 Magnum handgun after a discussion in which West proposed robbing a McFrugal Auto Rental store. Early on June 26,1992, West and Horace Dennis III were observed by an employee at a McFrugal Auto Rental store. The same employee saw Dennis with a man who matched West’s description at the store when the business closed at 6:00 p.m. The business was robbed between 6:00 and 6:30 p.m. and Paula Doggett, the sole employee on duty, was shot four times in the back with bullets capable of being fired from a .357 Magnum handgun. Although she managed to call 911, the wounds she received were fatal. Two men in a car displaying a McFrugal bumper sticker were seen leaving the scene shortly after the crimes were committed and West and Dennis were together at a mall 30 minutes after the crimes, at which time West displayed a roll [291]*291of cash and spent extravagant sums on shoes. Two friends of West testified that West had stated he had robbed someone and did not leave any witnesses. In a statement to police West claimed that Dennis committed the crimes. At trial Dennis testified that West committed the crimes.2

Decided February 19, 1996. Bush, Crowley, Leverett & Leggett, Michelle L. Schieber, for appellant. Charles H. Weston, District Attorney, Thomas J. Matthews, Assistant District Attorney, Michael J. Bowers, Attorney General, Wesley S. Homey, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

After reviewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the jury’s determination of guilt, we conclude that a rational trier of fact could have found West guilty of the crimes charged beyond a reasonable doubt. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979).

2. We have carefully reviewed West’s remaining enumerations. We find no error in the following: the denial of West’s motion to suppress the co-employee’s identification; the playing of the victim’s call to 911; the introduction of statements in two letters West wrote Dennis; the jury’s knowledge of Dennis’ trial and conviction; and a comment by the prosecutor about West “smirking.” The trial court’s finding that West received effective assistance of trial counsel is not clearly erroneous and thus is affirmed. Smith v. State, 256 Ga. 483 (351 SE2d 641) (1986).

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jackson v. Virginia
443 U.S. 307 (Supreme Court, 1979)
Smith v. State
351 S.E.2d 641 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1986)
Dennis v. State
449 S.E.2d 611 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
466 S.E.2d 854, 266 Ga. 290, 96 Fulton County D. Rep. 612, 1996 Ga. LEXIS 84, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/west-v-state-ga-1996.